Jurors set to deliberate in subway chokehold trial

Jurors set to deliberate in subway chokehold trial

A jury of 12 New Yorkers finished its first day of deliberations over the legal fate of Daniel Penny, a former US Marine who is accused of putting a homeless man in a fatal chokehold for six minutes on a New York subway train.

Mr Penny, 26, has faced a month-long trial in a Manhattan courtroom after pleading not guilty to charges of second-degree manslaughter and negligent homicide.

Prosecutors have cast him as reckless when he restrained the 30-year-old Jordan Neely, while Mr Penny’s attorneys say he stepped in to protect anxious subway riders.

After prosecutors finished their closing arguments on Tuesday, the judge read about an hour of instructions to jurors before sending them off in the afternoon to reach a verdict.

Mr Penny’s trial has reignited conversations about safety on public transportation in the largest US city and how the local government cares for residents struggling with homelessness and mental health issues.

On Monday, Steven Raiser, Mr Penny’s attorney, asked jurors to put themselves in Mr Penny’s shoes, saying that he and other subway passengers had “very little room” to move or run when Neely’s outburst began.

“Danny acted to save those people,” Mr Raiser said. “Who would you want on the next train ride with you?”

Watch: Penny says he ‘wasn’t trying to injure’ Neely in May 2023 police interview

Assistant District Attorney Dafna Yoran, meanwhile, told jurors the defendant had used “way too much force for way too long, in way too reckless a manner”.

“The defendant was given all the signs that he needed to stop. He ignored them, he kept going, until a man died. He must be held accountable for that,” Ms Yoran said on Tuesday.

Mr Penny could face up to 15 years behind bars if convicted of manslaughter.

The May 2023 incident quickly became a political flashpoint, with conservatives praising Mr Penny as a hero, and critics, including civil rights activists, saying he acted as an unjustified vigilante when he killed Mr Neely, who is black.

On 1 May, witnesses say that Mr Neely – who lived with severe mental illnesses – began shouting at other subway passengers, asking for money and screaming that he was hungry and wanted to go back to jail.

Lawyers for Mr Penny, who is white, say the Long Island native intervened out of fear Mr Neely would hurt other passengers, pinning him down for several minutes as he lost consciousness.

Mr Penny’s month-long trial has featured a host of evidence, including bystander videos of the chokehold, 911 calls and police body camera footage, as well as testimony from witnesses and people from Mr Penny’s past.

Mr Penny declined to testify during the trial, but the 12 anonymous New York jurors heard from the police who responded to the incident and subway passengers who witnessed the events.

Their testimony was divided, with some saying they felt threatened by Mr Neely’s erratic behaviour and others concerned over Mr Penny’s chokehold.

“I truly believed that I was going to die in that moment,” said Caedryn Schrunk, a witness on the New York F train that day.

Another man, Johnny Grima, said Mr Penny would not allow him to intervene when he asked to put Mr Neely on his side rather than in a chokehold.

“I’m concerned about the man, because he’s not moving,” Mr Grima told the court.

During the trial, prosecutors with the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office did not dispute Mr Penny’s desire to protect other passengers. Ms Yoran said during opening statements that this motivation was “even laudable”.

“But under the law, deadly physical force such as a chokehold is permitted only when it is absolutely necessary, and only for as long as it is absolutely necessary,” she said. “The defendant went way too far.”

Prosecutors also argued that as a former Marine, Mr Penny should have been aware that the chokehold could kill Mr Neely – and could have used less lethal methods to restrain him.

Mr Penny’s lawyers suggested other factors besides the chokehold could be responsible for Mr Neely’s death, including a combination of his drug use, schizophrenia and sickle cell trait. They cited testimony from a forensic pathologist whom they called as an expert witness.

A medical examiner ruled that Mr Neely died from neck compression, a finding she maintained during the trial.

Mr Neely was a Michael Jackson impersonator who performed in Times Square and was known throughout the city from his performances.

He had dozens of previous arrests on charges such as evading fares, theft and assaults on three women.

Family members said his mental health issues began more than 15 years earlier, when his mother was strangled by her boyfriend.

Related Content

PCB Chief’s Sharp Retort At Ex-Pakistan Coach Jason Gillespie Over “Utterly Blindsided” Remarks

Rajasthan Congress demands Nitin Gadkari’s resignation over Jaipur highway fire

Nara Devaansh sets world record in chess category

Leave a Comment